<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Imagekind Partners with Flickr; New Products for Everybody!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/</link>
	<description>A Blog for the Imagekind Art Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:59:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Miles</title>
		<link>http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/comment-page-1/#comment-23026</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 17:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/#comment-23026</guid>
		<description>When I import my flickr images, they appear to arrive at a lower resolution than the flickr version.  I have to upload from desktop to imagekind directly in order to see medium and large size prints on the Choose a Print Size page.

How can the import be done to ensure the full resolution is imported?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I import my flickr images, they appear to arrive at a lower resolution than the flickr version.  I have to upload from desktop to imagekind directly in order to see medium and large size prints on the Choose a Print Size page.</p>
<p>How can the import be done to ensure the full resolution is imported?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cressy</title>
		<link>http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/comment-page-1/#comment-7515</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cressy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/#comment-7515</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having an Art Gallery show opening on June 9th (Opening night and the monthly
Ballard Art Walk night.) at the Laura Frost Fine Art Gallery in Ballard; 
 5801-14th Ave. NW, Seattle, WA 98109
206-783-5314
blowingsands@hotmail.com

I&#039;ll be showing some of my latest Acrylic paintings along with a series of latest
prints. To view some of my art for the show and see other commercial ventures, click
on the link to my website:
www.mikecressy.com

Thanks,
Mike Cressy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having an Art Gallery show opening on June 9th (Opening night and the monthly<br />
Ballard Art Walk night.) at the Laura Frost Fine Art Gallery in Ballard;<br />
 5801-14th Ave. NW, Seattle, WA 98109<br />
206-783-5314<br />
<a href="mailto:blowingsands@hotmail.com">blowingsands@hotmail.com</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be showing some of my latest Acrylic paintings along with a series of latest<br />
prints. To view some of my art for the show and see other commercial ventures, click<br />
on the link to my website:<br />
<a href="http://www.mikecressy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mikecressy.com</a></p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Mike Cressy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CurtisNeeley</title>
		<link>http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/comment-page-1/#comment-3898</link>
		<dc:creator>CurtisNeeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 01:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/#comment-3898</guid>
		<description>Could there we a way that those of us who are semi-famous artists could use imagekind  as our &#039;darkroom&#039;? 
We could then let our buyers pay for a &#039;signed&#039; print that may or may not be framed and imagekind would ship it to us to sign and return to imagekind for framing and shipping to the buyer?  The thing that makes a CurtisNeeley original more valuable is the signature.  POD works superbly and I have gotten pieces printed through imagekind and then signed them and hung them in an art show.  They sold fairly well.  imagekind could just retain the cost of the piece till they receive the signed print to ship.  It would give the artists the ability to use imagekind as their own custom &#039;darkroom&#039; and take advantage of selling directly through imagekind.  As it is now, I could sell using Paypal and order the print myself.  That is what I am considering doing but it would be more convenient to use imagekind to process directly and pay a small per-sale fee.

**POOF**
Offering a signature limited edition is available for photo &#039;artists&#039; using imagekind as their darkroom!
 
The &#039;collector&#039; could also pay for shipping from the artists location out of the proceeds of the sale and imagekind could send the shipping label with the piece.  There would be a USPS delivery receipt.  eBay does this.  You guys could too.  It would open up a new realm of possibility for pro users.  It would take only three more minutes of your time and open up worlds of potential.  
 
Also,  Could you consider offering a feature for pro members that they can offer the above idea from their own site without the imagekind header.  
You see it on my site at http://www.CurtisNeeley.com/ART.html  
I would prefer it look like this  - http://www.CurtisNeeley.com/ikart.html 
It looks much more concise and worthy of being on MY own site that the version I have there now that invites anyone with a fancy phone to sell art prints while presenting what I feel is much more significant a body of work.  It would be nice if it did not try to sell imagekind while I sell my art.  This would help maintain my artistic &#039;flair&#039;.
**Poof** 
 
Somebody please tell me why this isn&#039;t a option already or just say screw off!  
I think this would be a simple option to add that could be triggered using the referrer information?  I may not have a leg to stand on when saying this.  Having no legs makes that a common occurrence for me! Ha. My website gets upward of 200 unique viewers a day.  If I must, I will incorporate a shopping cart via PayPal to bypass presenting imagekind while I try to sell my art.
 
CurtisNeeley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could there we a way that those of us who are semi-famous artists could use imagekind  as our &#8216;darkroom&#8217;?<br />
We could then let our buyers pay for a &#8217;signed&#8217; print that may or may not be framed and imagekind would ship it to us to sign and return to imagekind for framing and shipping to the buyer?  The thing that makes a CurtisNeeley original more valuable is the signature.  POD works superbly and I have gotten pieces printed through imagekind and then signed them and hung them in an art show.  They sold fairly well.  imagekind could just retain the cost of the piece till they receive the signed print to ship.  It would give the artists the ability to use imagekind as their own custom &#8216;darkroom&#8217; and take advantage of selling directly through imagekind.  As it is now, I could sell using Paypal and order the print myself.  That is what I am considering doing but it would be more convenient to use imagekind to process directly and pay a small per-sale fee.</p>
<p>**POOF**<br />
Offering a signature limited edition is available for photo &#8216;artists&#8217; using imagekind as their darkroom!</p>
<p>The &#8216;collector&#8217; could also pay for shipping from the artists location out of the proceeds of the sale and imagekind could send the shipping label with the piece.  There would be a USPS delivery receipt.  eBay does this.  You guys could too.  It would open up a new realm of possibility for pro users.  It would take only three more minutes of your time and open up worlds of potential.  </p>
<p>Also,  Could you consider offering a feature for pro members that they can offer the above idea from their own site without the imagekind header.<br />
You see it on my site at <a href="http://www.CurtisNeeley.com/ART.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.CurtisNeeley.com/ART.html</a><br />
I would prefer it look like this  &#8211; <a href="http://www.CurtisNeeley.com/ikart.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.CurtisNeeley.com/ikart.html</a><br />
It looks much more concise and worthy of being on MY own site that the version I have there now that invites anyone with a fancy phone to sell art prints while presenting what I feel is much more significant a body of work.  It would be nice if it did not try to sell imagekind while I sell my art.  This would help maintain my artistic &#8216;flair&#8217;.<br />
**Poof** </p>
<p>Somebody please tell me why this isn&#8217;t a option already or just say screw off!<br />
I think this would be a simple option to add that could be triggered using the referrer information?  I may not have a leg to stand on when saying this.  Having no legs makes that a common occurrence for me! Ha. My website gets upward of 200 unique viewers a day.  If I must, I will incorporate a shopping cart via PayPal to bypass presenting imagekind while I try to sell my art.</p>
<p>CurtisNeeley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis Neeley</title>
		<link>http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/comment-page-1/#comment-3887</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis Neeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/#comment-3887</guid>
		<description>Could there we a way that those of us who are semi-famous artists could use imagekind  as our darkroom?  We could then let our buyers pay for a &#039;signed&#039; print that may or may not be framed and imagekind would ship it to us to sign and return for framing and shipping to the buyer?  The thing that makes a CurtisNeeley original valuable is the signature.  POD works superbly and I have gotten pieces printed through imagekind and then signed them and hung them in an art show.  They sold fairly well.  imagekind could just retain the cost of the piece till they receive the signed print to ship.  
**POOF**  A signature limited edition is available!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could there we a way that those of us who are semi-famous artists could use imagekind  as our darkroom?  We could then let our buyers pay for a &#8217;signed&#8217; print that may or may not be framed and imagekind would ship it to us to sign and return for framing and shipping to the buyer?  The thing that makes a CurtisNeeley original valuable is the signature.  POD works superbly and I have gotten pieces printed through imagekind and then signed them and hung them in an art show.  They sold fairly well.  imagekind could just retain the cost of the piece till they receive the signed print to ship.<br />
**POOF**  A signature limited edition is available!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Powen</title>
		<link>http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/comment-page-1/#comment-3566</link>
		<dc:creator>Powen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imagekind.com/2007/04/24/imagekind-partners-with-flickr-new-products-for-everybody/#comment-3566</guid>
		<description>This would be great if I could find the prices for ordering my own &quot;creations&quot; on the Imagekind website.  Perhaps I&#039;m looking in the wrong place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be great if I could find the prices for ordering my own &#8220;creations&#8221; on the Imagekind website.  Perhaps I&#8217;m looking in the wrong place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
